What an amazing book! Written by Canadian Charles Taylor, this book changed the way I look at modernism, individualism, economics, and politics. Taylor is truly an advocate of a Buddha-like middle ground where we acknowledge the struggles that go on around us without feeling elation at the loss of power on one side or despair at our own idealogical losses. Brilliant! I'm back to longer posts now, so please excuse the tome, but I have to remember this for class.
Taylor begins his argument by defining three "malaises" that have gripped us concerning the onset and subsequent success of modernity. These three malaises are interrelated and overlapping, but for the sake of clarity, they are:
1. Individualism that slides into a narcissistic outlook on life.
2. The primacy of instrumental reason that promotes the most efficient and economical means as leading to the best ends.
3. A lack of participation in government resulting from a focus on individual contentment that allows the government to become a tutelary power over which the citizens have no control.
According to Taylor, the way to combat these malaises is to rediscover the moral sources from which these ideas come and work toward the moral ideal without getting caught up in the ears surrounding both sides of each argument. And each argument does have two sides!
Just as a side note, I wonder if the casual drop of "ends" and "means" is meant to remind us of Machiavelli who is most often misquoted as saying, "The ends justify the means." Regardless of whether or not Machiavelli actually says this (he doesn't), his book
The Prince does support an outlook in which whatever means one uses to reach a good goal are thereby justified as good because the goal is good. This is an obviously controversial argument, but my concern here is how it can be used to explain the problems with instrumental reason. If for Machiavelli, the goal was of primary significance; then for instrumental reason, the means are of primary significance. However, instead of being a much more moral philosophy, this has degraded into a system in which the most efficient means lead to the best result: there is no justification for doing something the hard way, even if the end result is a higher quality product. This is at the extreme of course.